Somewhere in your family's history, someone stood in a grocer's shop and counted out coins for bread, milk, and butter, doing the exact same math you do at the checkout line today.
The numbers on their bill would look almost like a joke now.
A whole pound of bread for six cents. A dozen eggs for less than forty cents.
But the joke falls apart pretty quickly once you look at what those coins actually meant to the person holding them.
This is a look at what groceries really cost in the early 1900s, using actual government price records instead of the rounded off, half remembered numbers that tend to circulate online.
It also looks at what those prices meant for an average household, since a low price tag means very little without knowing how much a person earned to pay it.
What a Grocery Bill Actually Looked Like in 1913
The federal government did not start systematically tracking retail food prices across the country until 1913, the same year the Consumer Price Index was born. That makes 1913 the natural starting point for any serious comparison, since it is the first year with solid, nationwide numbers instead of scattered local price lists.
Here is what the average American grocery bill looked like that year, based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics' own historical records.
The Official 1913 Price List
Item - Average Price in January 1913
Bread - $0.056 per pound
Flour - $0.033 per pound
Fresh milk - $0.089 per quart
Butter - $0.409 per pound
Cheese - $0.222 per pound
Eggs - $0.373 per dozen
Sugar - $0.058 per pound
Rice - $0.086 per pound
Coffee - $0.299 per pound
Potatoes - $0.016 per pound
Sirloin steak - $0.238 per pound
Round steak - $0.205 per pound
Chuck roast - $0.149 per pound
Pork chops - $0.187 per pound
Bacon - $0.254 per pound
Ham - $0.251 per pound
These figures come directly from Bureau of Labor Statistics retail price bulletins, the same agency that still publishes food price data today. Butter was the single most expensive item per pound on the entire list, while potatoes were by far the cheapest, at under two cents a pound.
Why 1913 Is Where the Record Starts
It would be easy to assume grocery prices simply were not tracked before 1913 because record keeping was primitive. That is not quite the full story.
Local newspapers, city bureaus, and individual merchants had been noting prices for decades before that. What changed in 1913 was the creation of a single, standardized national system, run by one federal agency, using the same methodology in dozens of cities every single month. That consistency is what makes the 1913 numbers so useful for comparison, and it is also why economists and historians treat that year as a kind of starting line for modern price history.
What Happened to These Prices Over the Following Century
The Bureau of Labor Statistics itself ran the obvious comparison in 2013, exactly one hundred years after it started collecting this data, lining up January 1913 prices against January 2013 prices for the same items.
The results were dramatic in some categories and surprisingly mild in others. Potatoes, the cheapest item in 1913, saw the sharpest increase of anything on the list, climbing more than thirty nine times over by 2013. Eggs told the opposite story. Of every item the Bureau tracked, egg prices rose the least over that century, increasing only about fivefold, largely because modern hatcheries, refrigeration, and distribution made eggs dramatically more efficient to produce and ship than they were when a family down the street kept the hens.
Meanwhile bread went from about six cents a pound to well over a dollar, and coffee climbed from around thirty cents a pound to nearly six dollars.
Prices have kept moving since that 2013 comparison too, and not always at the same pace across categories. In the years since, beef and eggs in particular have swung far more sharply than most other groceries, driven by factors like disease outbreaks in poultry flocks and shifts in cattle supply, while items like fresh vegetables have occasionally dipped in price year over year. The broad trend of the last century, though, has held steady. Some foods have essentially kept pace with general inflation, and a few, like eggs, have actually become cheaper relative to everything else, while others have pulled further ahead of the average.
What These Prices Meant for an Average Family
A six cent loaf of bread only means something once you know what a typical paycheck looked like at the time.
Around 1900, the average American worker earned about thirteen dollars a week, working roughly sixty hours to get there. That works out to somewhere around six hundred and seventy five dollars a year. By the mid 1910s, average yearly earnings had crept up to somewhere around seven hundred and fifty dollars, though plenty of workers, especially immigrants, women, and laborers outside the cities, earned considerably less than that average.
Against that backdrop, food was not a minor line item. Government studies from the era found that urban families spent an average of around forty six percent of their income on food and alcohol combined in the early 1900s. Compare that to today, where U.S. consumers spend an average of under ten percent of disposable income on food of any kind, according to recent Department of Agriculture figures.
In other words, a family in 1913 was spending close to half of everything they earned just to eat, while a family today typically spends a small fraction of that share. The six cent loaf of bread was cheap in absolute terms, but it was competing for a much bigger slice of a much smaller paycheck.
Which Foods Actually Got More Expensive, and Which Didn't
One of the more interesting patterns in a century of grocery data is how unevenly prices moved.
Potatoes and flour, both cheap staples in 1913, climbed faster than almost anything else on the list in percentage terms, partly because they started from such a low base. A few cents added to a sixteen cent price tag looks small in raw numbers but represents a massive percentage jump.
Butter, the priciest item per pound in 1913, actually grew more slowly in percentage terms than several cheaper items, even though its dollar value kept rising. Coffee and rice both grew at a more moderate pace than red meat, and eggs, as mentioned earlier, barely moved at all in relative terms compared to the rest of the basket.
The lesson buried in all of this is that no single number tells the whole story of what happened to food prices over the last century. Some staples became a genuine bargain relative to everything else around them. Others, especially the cheapest items on the shelf a hundred years ago, saw their prices climb the furthest.
What a Full Week of Groceries Actually Looked Like
Picture a household grocery list from 1913, not as a spreadsheet of numbers, but as an actual week of meals.
Bread and flour formed the backbone of most meals, since both were cheap and filling. Potatoes stretched even further, showing up at nearly every dinner because a ten pound sack cost less than a single pound of bacon. Meat was there, but it was budgeted carefully, with cheaper cuts like chuck roast appearing far more often than sirloin steak, which cost noticeably more per pound.
Eggs and butter were treated with more caution than we treat them today, since both fluctuated seasonally in a way modern refrigeration and year round production have mostly erased. Hens laid fewer eggs in winter, which pushed prices up during the colder months, something a modern shopper rarely has to think about at all.
Households of the era also bought items that have all but disappeared from a modern grocery list. Lard, hens sold whole rather than in cuts, and coarse corn meal were kitchen staples in 1913 that the Bureau of Labor Statistics eventually stopped tracking altogether, simply because so few households still bought them by the time later surveys were designed.
What This Means for Your Own Family's History
Numbers on a government spreadsheet only carry so much weight on their own. What actually brings a grocery bill like this to life is picturing the specific person who paid it.
Somebody in your own family history stood at a counter like this at some point, doing quiet math about whether pork chops or chuck roast made more sense that week, whether butter could wait until payday, whether a dozen eggs was worth the stretch. Those decisions rarely made it into any letter or diary entry, because they felt too small and too ordinary to write down at the time.
That is exactly why they tend to disappear first. Big events get remembered. Weddings, moves, wars, the year someone got their first car. The quiet, repeated decisions about how to stretch a paycheck across a family's meals almost never survive, even though they shaped daily life just as much as anything bigger did.
If you still have a grandparent or older relative who remembers stretching a grocery budget in leaner years, that is a story worth asking about before it disappears the way so many household budgets from 1913 already have. Memoracy was built for exactly that kind of story, the quiet, ordinary details of a life that never make it into a family photo album but that say more about who someone was than almost anything else could.
Sign up and start your first story on Memoracy today.
